Talking Points Memo strikes out in trying to ridicule Conservapedia, so it makes a snide remark about the Bible too. TPM readers and writers, check out this table:
| Counterexamples to the Bible | 0 |
| Counterexamples to Evolution | 60 |
| IQ of Atheists | 0 divided by 60 |
I kid you not. This was of course in reply to a Talking Points Memo article pointing out the absurdity of such topics in Conservapedia as trying to debunk such "liberal" ideas as the Theory of Relativity. And Black Holes.
The theory of relativity is a mathematical system that allows no exceptions. It is heavily promoted by liberals who like its encouragement of relativism and its tendency to mislead people in how they view the world. Here is a list of 24 counterexamples: any one of them shows that the theory is incorrect.
Read that again: Any one of them shows that the theory is incorrect. Any one. Any one. Any one. Andy Won...
Among those any and ones are these inconvenient proofs against the ToR:
- The theory predicts wormholes just as it predicts black holes, but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.
- The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54.
And the Footnote Of Fortune?:
"Virtually no one who is taught and believes relativity continues to read the Bible, a book that outsells New York Times bestsellers by a hundred-fold."
In the interest of fairness, I was taught relativity. But I don't understand it, so I'm not sure if I believe it, or if I'm supposed to believe in it. But I more or less accept that it is true until something more accepted comes along to replace it.
Yet, I still read my Bible. And I'm pretty sure that I helped it to outsell NYT bestsellers. But I've yet to buy it a hundred times for every NYT bestseller that I've bought. If only I wasn't taught that dreaded theory!
No comments:
Post a Comment